Skip to content
MSAMM
Back to the knowledge baseHCM

Absence accruals look wrong for someone hired mid-month

A worker hired part-way through a period receives a full period's entitlement instead of a proportion, or receives nothing at all.

Most likely causes

  • The accrual plan has no proration rule. Without one, the plan grants the whole period's amount to anyone enrolled on the accrual date.
  • Enrolment start does not match the hire date. Plan enrolment is driven by eligibility, and eligibility can begin later than the hire — a waiting period is the usual reason.
  • The accrual has not run since the hire. Balances move when the accrual process runs, not when the person is hired.

What to check

  • Whether the plan defines a proration formula, and what period it prorates against.
  • The worker's plan enrolment date against their hire date — a gap here explains most cases.
  • The last successful run of the accrual process, and whether it covered the period in question.
  • Whether the worker's assignment has a working-hours pattern, if the plan accrues by hours rather than by period.

Before changing anything

Proration rules apply to future accrual runs. Correcting a plan does not retrospectively adjust balances already granted — those usually need an explicit adjustment, which is worth planning rather than discovering.

If none of the above explains it, raise a ticket and include what you checked. Reading this article cost you no hours.

Still stuck? Raising a ticket costs no hours until you accept a consultant's proposal.

Raise a support ticket