Submission and grading

Eight deliverables: a design document on the provided template; an assumptions log with every ambiguity resolved and justified; a configured environment as a screenshot evidence pack; transaction evidence — a full cycle in each subledger; three financial reports as specified by the CFO; a migration reconciliation pack from subledger to general ledger to source; an SoD assessment with conflicts identified and mitigations proposed; and a go-live readiness checklist — your own, defended. The rubric: design decisions and justification thirty per cent, judged on reasoning quality rather than on matching the model answer. Configuration correctness twenty-five. Transaction evidence fifteen — full cycles, correct accounting, journals explained. Reporting ten — reports run, balance, and meet the stated requirement. Migration and reconciliation ten — balances agree, variances explained. Controls and segregation of duties ten — conflicts found, mitigations realistic. Pass mark seventy; distinction eighty-five. The thirty per cent on design justification is deliberate.…

In this module: Module 16 · Full Implementation Capstone

1. 1How the capstone works
2. 2The client brief
3. 3Building your project plan
4. 4Submission and grading
5. 5Solution walkthrough
6. 6Common submission mistakes